Adaptive Market Hypothesis And Overconfidence Bias

Manel Mahjoubi (1) , Jamel Eddine Henchiri (2)
(1) Agence Nationale de Métrologie , Tunisia
(2) Agence Nationale de Métrologie , Tunisia


This paper examines the effect of excessive investor confidence on market efficiency. We study this impact for 21 developed markets and 25 emerging markets for a period from January 2006 until June 2020. First, we estimate weak market efficiency using the auto-correlation test (Ljung-Box, 1978). Thus, based on the adaptive approach, we assume that the overconfidence of investors has a negative impact on market efficiency. Concerning the over-confidence variable; we use the transaction volume decomposition method of Chuang and Lee (2006). Finally, we used the logit panel model to study the impact the impact of investor overconfidence on market efficiency. The result shows that during our study period, the trust bias had no impact either on the efficiency of developed markets or on the efficiency of emerging markets. We attribute this result to successive crises during our study period, including the subprime crisis, the eurozone crisis, the stock market crash in China, and the COVID crisis, which likely caused investors to become pessimistic and lose confidence in the stock market.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Abbes, M. (2013). Does Overconfidence Bias Explain Volatility During the Global Financial Crisis? Transition Studies Review, 19, 291-312.

Abedini, B. (n.d.). Weak-form efficiency: stock market in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 2009, 15-20.

Almail, A., & Almudhaf, F. (2017). Adaptive Market Hypothesis: Evidence from three centuries of UK data. Economics and Business Letters, 6(2), 48-53.

Aumeboonsuke, V., & Dryver, A. L. (2014). The importance of using a test of weak-form market efficiency that does not require investigating the data first. International Review of Economics & Finance, 33, 350-357.

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261-292.

Boujelbène, M., Boujelbène, Y., & Bouri, A. (2009). Overconfidence bias: Explanation of market anomalies French market case. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 4.

Boussaidi, R. (2022). Implications of the overconfidence bias in presence of private information: Evidence from MENA stock markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 3660-3678.

Boya, C. M. (2019). From efficient markets to adaptive markets: Evidence from the French stock exchange. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 156-165.

Chkioua, D. H. (2021). Excess Volatility in the Tunisian Stock Market: Explanation by Behavioral Finance. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 12, 1-11.

Chuang, W.-I., & Lee, B.-S. (2006). An empirical evaluation of the overconfidence hypothesis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 2489-2515.

Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53, 1839-1885.

Daniel, K. D., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2001). Overconfidence, Arbitrage, and Equilibrium Asset Pricing. The Journal of Finance, 56, 921-965.

Drury, C. (2008). Management and Cost Accounting. Retrieved from

Ertaş, F., & Özkan, O. (2018). Piyasa Etkinliği Açısından Adaptif Piyasa Hipotezi'nin Test Edilmesi: Türkiye ve ABD Hisse Senedi Piyasaları Örneği-Testing the Adaptive Market Hypothesis in Terms of Market Efficiency: The Case of Turkey and the US Stock Markets, 642, 23-40.

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.

Fama, E. F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices.

Farmer, J. D., & Lo, A. W. (1999). Frontiers of finance: evolution and efficient markets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96, 9991-9992.

Frankfurter, G., & Mcgoun, E. (2001). Anomalies in finance: What are they and what are they good for? International Review of Financial Analysis, 10, 407-429.

Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Rao, K., Stroebel, J., & Weber, A. (2021). Climate Change and Long-Run Discount Rates: Evidence from Real Estate. The Review of Financial Studies, 34, 3527-3571.

Hiremath, G. S., & Narayan, S. (2016). Testing the adaptive market hypothesis and its determinants for the Indian stock markets. Finance Research Letters, 19, 173-180.

Hirshleifer, D., & Shumway, T. (2003). Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather. The Journal of Finance, 58, 1009-1032.

Jlassi, M., Naoui, K., & Mansour, W. (2014). Overconfidence Behavior and Dynamic Market Volatility: Evidence from International Data. Procedia Economics and Finance, 13, 128-142.

Kim, J. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Lim, K.-P. (2011). Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18, 868-879.

Kılıç, Y. (2020). Adaptive Market Hypothesis: Evidence from the Turkey Stock Market.

Kruger, J. W., & Vatiswa, Nthoesane, M. G. (2011). Share Price Reaction to Earnings Announcement on the JSE-ALTX.

Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65, 297-303.

Lo, A. W. (2019). Adaptive markets: financial evolution at the speed of thought. Princeton University Press.

Lo, A. W. (2012). Adaptive Markets and the New World Order. MIT web domain.

Lo, A. W. (2005). Reconciling Efficient Markets with Behavioral Finance: The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1702447). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.

Lo, A. W. (2004). The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Market Efficiency from an Evolutionary Perspective (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 602222). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.

Montier, J. (2002). Darwin's Mind: The Evolutionary Foundations of Heuristics and Biases.

Mushinada, V. N. C., & Veluri, V. S. S. (2018). Investors overconfidence behaviour at Bombay Stock Exchange. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 14, 613-632.

Naseem, S., Mohsin, M., Hui, W., Liyan, G., & Penglai, K. (2021a). The Investor Psychology and Stock Market Behavior During the Initial Era of COVID-19: A Study of China, Japan, and the United States. Front Psychol, 12, 626934.

Naseem, S., Mohsin, M., Hui, W., Liyan, G., & Penglai, K. (2021b). The Investor Psychology and Stock Market Behavior During the Initial Era of COVID-19: A Study of China, Japan, and the United States. Front Psychol, 12, 626934.

Neely, C. J., Weller, P. A., & Ulrich, J. M. (2009). The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Evidence from the Foreign Exchange Market. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 467-488.

Odean, T. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? The Journal of Finance, 53, 1775-1798.

Phan Tran Trung, D., & Pham Quang, H. (2019). Adaptive Market Hypothesis: Evidence from the Vietnamese Stock Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12, 81.

Pikulina, E., Renneboog, L., & Tobler, P. N. (2017). Overconfidence and investment: An experimental approach. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 175-192.

Rossi, M. (2015). The efficient market hypothesis and calendar anomalies: a literature review. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 7, 285-296.

Shiller, R. J. (2003). From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 83-104.

Shrotryia, V. K., & Kalra, H. (2021a). COVID-19 and overconfidence bias: the case of developed, emerging and frontier markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18, 633-665.

Shrotryia, V. K., & Kalra, H. (2021b). Herding in the crypto market: a diagnosis of heavy distribution tails. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14, 566-587.

Simon, H. A. (1955). On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions. Biometrika, 42, 425-440.

Statman, M., Thorley, S., & Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor Overconfidence and Trading Volume. The Review of Financial Studies, 19, 1531-1565.

Subash, R. (2012). Role of Behavioral Finance in Portfolio Investment Decisions: Evidence from India.

Thaler, R. H. (2005). Advances in Behavioral Finance, Volume II. Princeton University Press.

Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206.<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F

Zafar, Z., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). Behavioral Finance Perspectives on Pakistan Stock Market Efficiency: Assessing the Prospect Theory Empirically Using Adaptive Pattern of Efficiency across Military and Democratic Phases.


Manel Mahjoubi (Primary Contact)
Jamel Eddine Henchiri
Author Biographies

Manel Mahjoubi, Agence Nationale de Métrologie

Dr Maneel Mahjoubi is currently an Assistant at the Higher Institute of Management- University of Gabes, in Tunisia. He obtained his PhD in finance from Faculty of Economics and Management - University of Sfax, in Tunisia. Member at the Research Unit on Research, Business and Decisions (UR-RED), in Higher Institute of Management of Gabes (University of Gabes, in Tunisia). He also participated in several high-profile conferences.

Jamel Eddine Henchiri, Agence Nationale de Métrologie

Pr. Jamel Eddine Henchiri, is currently a Professor at the Higher Institute of Management- University of Gabes, in Tunisia.Also, he is the director of the Research Unit on Research, Business and Decisions (UR-RED), in the University of Gabes, in Tunisia). Since its creation in 2013. In addition, he has been the president of the scientific journal Journal of Academic Finance (JoAF), since 2010. Also, he is the founder and main organizer of the international conference CSIFA: International Scientific Conference on Finance and Insurance, since 2006, and participated in several high-profile conferences. He was also appointed director of the Higher Institute of Management- University of Gabes, in Tunisia, during the years 2013 and 2014. He obtained his PhD in Management Science from Rennes University in France (1 IGR-IAE de Rennes: Rennes, Bretagne, FR).

Mahjoubi, M., & Henchiri, J. E. (2024). Adaptive Market Hypothesis And Overconfidence Bias. ECONOMÍA CHILENA, 27(1), 9–19.

Article Details

  • Abstract 160
  • PDF 109

Most read articles by the same author(s)